 |
| |
 |
Warriors, bishops and feudal vassals
In the very composite picture of powers, the main features of which were unquestionably
represented by several important feudal families and by the Bishop of Arezzo, a new element
must be added: the nascent autonomous power of the
Italian city-states (Communes).
The contessa Matilde had no sooner died than several cities had already made themselves into autonomous
institutions. In Arezzo, the power had been held by consular magistrates since 1098, to the point that,
from that moment on, the aristocracy who had fought over and divided up the valley by tying up roads,
bridges, passes and rivers began to have to consider the
presence of serious antagonists.
In the end, they had to succumb in the face of the formation of the new institutional realities, that
were "germinated in the flourishing and dynamic mercantile cities, the ladies of the plains"
(Manneschi, 1921: 20-21).
Even if assailed from several parts and above all by Florence, which gave rise to an unstoppable
expansion of its dominion in the direction of Arezzo, feudalism nevertheless maintained its positions
of power for a long time, and perhaps these were never completely dissolved until the modern age.
|
 |
 |
 Cocollo castle |
In 1219, the Counts Guidi had to underwrite
weighty pacts
with the Florentines, on the basis of which they undertook to "give free entry, accommodation
and exit in the said castle and keep of Montemurlo to whoever and whenever the Florentines wish".
In addition to this, they had to accept the Florentine presence also in other strongholds located
on their lands. In fact, the document stipulated that "for the complete safety of observation,
|
 |
 |
besides the debt and mortgage of the Castle of Montemurlo, they mortgage also to the Florentines the castles and jurisdictions of Montegnalchi,
Loro,
Pozzo,
Lanciolina,
della Trappola
et omnia alia castra, terras possessiones, homines".
Starting from the last decade of the 13th century, the Counts Guidi appeared to be in full deterioration, first of all because the cities - and Florence in particular - had progressively eroded their domains. In 1293, the Florentines took several fortresses away from the Guidi family and also the
Castle of Loro.
The latter returned shortly afterwards to Guidi control even if, in a continuous overturning of political destinies linked to the bitter conflict between the Guelphs and the Ghibellines, Florence finally succeeded in prevailing. It returned definitively in possession of Loro, as was established by the commission of 19 August 1306. From that moment on, having become a part of the Florentine territory, Loro was governed by a functionary ("podestŕ")
nominated by the ruler
while also Arezzo became a subdivided city of Florence in 1337.
Despite this presence, however, the ancient feudal power
still remained strong.
Also the matter of the Castle of Trappola was included in the struggle undertaken by Florence to impose its predominance in the zone.
|
 |
 |
The political instability and the recurring incursions of troops began to diminish with time, and this regained security certainly acted as a background to a penetration that was no longer just military and political on the part of the Florentines (or Aretines), but was above all of the citizen land owners. Towards the end of the 15th century, in fact, we find in these zones a
reduced peasant ownership in minimum terms, in favour of that of the rich exponents of the emerging citizen classes and, also, a conspicuous ecclesiastical property with a considerable diffusion of
shareholding contracts.
In 1642, the first statutes of the community were drawn up.
|
 |
| |
|